TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM MENGATASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM GLOBAL BERDASARKAN PRINSIP COMMON BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITIES DALAM HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
Keywords:
Tanggung Jawab Negara, Perubahan Iklim, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities, Hukum Internasional, Perjanjian ParisAbstract
Global climate change constitutes a multidimensional challenge that requires a collective response from the international community through the framework of international law. This study aims to analyze state responsibility in addressing climate change based on the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) in international law. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches toward the principal international legal instruments, namely the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol, and the Paris Agreement. The findings indicate that the CBDR principle serves as the normative foundation of the international climate regime by emphasizing common responsibility among all states while differentiating obligations based on historical emissions and respective national capabilities. The principle has evolved from a strict differentiation model under the Kyoto Protocol to a more universal and participatory approach under the Paris Agreement. Although CBDR provides a framework for global climate justice, its implementation continues to face challenges related to climate finance, technology transfer, and compliance mechanisms. Strengthening accountability and enhancing national ambition are therefore essential to ensure the effective fulfillment of state responsibility in confronting the global climate crisis.
References
Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A new hope? American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288–319.https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.2.028
Brunnée, J. (2009). Climate change, global environmental justice and international environmental law. Environmental Law Reporter, 39, 10638–10655.
Brown Weiss, E. (2011). The evolution of international environmental law. Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 54, 1–27.
Crawford, J. (2013). State responsibility: The general part. Cambridge University Press. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press.
International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II, Part Two.
Okereke, C. (2010). Climate justice and the international regime: Before, during, and after Copenhagen. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 462–474.
Rajamani, L. (2006). Differential treatment in international environmental law. Oxford University Press.
Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North–South politics, and climate policy. MIT Press.
Sands, P., & Peel, J. (2018). Principles of international environmental law (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Treaty Series, 1771 U.N.T.S. 107.
United Nations. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Treaty Series, 2303 U.N.T.S. 162.
United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations Treaty Collection. Voigt, C., & Ferreira, F. (2016). ‘Dynamic differentiation’: The principles of CBDR-RC in the Paris Agreement. Climate Law, 6(1–2), 58–74.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Emissions gap report 2022. UNEP.
