HARMONISASI REGULASI PENGELOLAAN RUMAH SUSUN: MITIGASI KONFLIK PENAGIHAN IPL MELALUI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN
Keywords:
IPL, Mitigasi Konflik, Restorative Justice, Rumah Susun, Perlindungan KonsumenAbstract
Conflicts between the Management Board and apartment unit owners regarding the collection of Environmental Management Fees (IPL) often create prolonged social and legal tensions. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy of these actions through the lens of the Consumer Protection Law, contract law, and criminal law using normative juridical research methods. This study analyzes the urgency of harmonizing regulations on apartment management by integrating the principles of Restorative Justice and the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK). Through normative juridical research methods, it was found that unilateral termination is a form of abuse of power relations that violates Article 18 of the UUPK and consumer human rights. The study shows that unilateral termination is a form of abuse of power relations that violates basic consumer rights and contradicts the principle of propriety, so that the clause in the House Rules that legitimizes this practice is declared null and void. As a mitigation solution, this study offers a Restorative Justice paradigm that prioritizes dialogue and relationship restoration to avoid the practice of vigilantism or eigenrichting which carries criminal risks. This study offers a new paradigm in conflict resolution through penal mediation (restorative justice) and a relationship restoration approach, to avoid the practice of vigilantism (eigenrichting). The results of the study recommend the need for policy reform that prioritizes dialogue and proportional sanctions to create harmony in life in flats.
References
Hidayat, M. (2019). Tanggung jawab badan pengelola terhadap fasilitas-fasilitas rumah susun komersial. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(1), 45-60.
Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2014). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Sinar Grafika.
Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-bab tentang penemuan hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2010). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Rajawali Pers.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 14/PRT/M/2021 tentang Perhimpunan Pemilik dan Penghuni Satuan Rumah Susun.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 13 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Rumah Susun.
Permatasari, E. (2022). Larangan Terkait Perjanjian Baku Menurut UU Perlindungan Konsumen. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/larangan-terkait-perjanjian-baku-menurut-uu-perlindungan-konsumen-lt605e3b2a6d4c2/
Pratama, D. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keperdataan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(3), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.aS2104/aAaq.vd2i1.334577
Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Santoso, U. (2014). Hukum perumahan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Saputra, A., & Wulandari, R. (2020). Klausula Baku dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Satuan Rumah Susun Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Hukum Perdata Indonesia, 3(2), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.61222/tx4350m0491
Septian, K. (2024). Apa itu ‘logical fallacy’ atau sesat pikir dan macam yang harus kamu tahu. Magdalene. https://magdalene.co/story/jenis-logical-fallacy/
Subekti, R. (2005). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa.
Tobing, D. M. L. (2019). Klausula Baku: Paradoks dalam Penegakan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 108, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5252.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 42, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3821.
